Logo Platform
logo amplifiers simplified

Peace & Prosperity

Reply
Copied to clipboard!
8 years ago
Jan 5, 2017, 3:19:27 AM

Trying the Lumeris I figured I would follow in their pacifist ways and needless to say was impressed. After bringing the galaxy to peace and reaching trade agreements the economy literally flourished.


A solid 1.5 mil dust per turn, turn 142


One of 5 companies 

        List of internationally trading companies


My empire and its trade routes

I managed to have a good spread for company HQs in the galaxy


The Cravers were also in this game, but were pushed to an isolated star system then eventually absorbed by my empire's raw influence (along with countless other star systems). There is a lot I could talk about but this post would be Endless  so I'm keeping it short. Hopefully these numbers calm down a little bit in future updates though.


Additional info

             


I appreciate how this galaxy ended up in stark contrast to 1st one as the Cravers, war consumed galaxy, hull planets and an empire in complete rebellion.


Would love to hear and see some data on other people's crazy empires.


0Send private message
0Send private message
8 years ago
Jan 5, 2017, 10:30:42 AM

Impressive.


There's the promised potential, and even better underlaying trade routes.


May I ask about your glaxy, difficultity and other game settings?

0Send private message
8 years ago
Jan 5, 2017, 1:18:38 PM
Kweel_Nakashyn wrote:

Wow !


Did you use Dictatorship's bonus on top of this ?


I had a Republic government with Trusted Broker, Super Tax and Fair Trade. Maybe I should of went Democratic for more laws, but didn't really try to maximize. I believe Dictatorship's bonus and Super Tax don't apply to trade routes or agreements.



lo_fabre wrote:

Impressive.


There's the promised potential, and even better underlaying trade routes.


May I ask about your glaxy, difficultity and other game settings?


Galaxy was Twin Elliptical, medium size, normal age and unique constellations.

Had 5 competitors, normal speed and hard difficulty.

0Send private message
8 years ago
Jan 5, 2017, 2:14:49 PM

Peace with filthy aliens? Bah! Heresy!

But since we're sharing, here's my interpretation of a crazy empire!

(granted it's not as good as yours but it's only turn 127!)


The companies (no trade with xenos!):

Company spread and positioning could have been better, but ultimately unimportant since income becomes ridiculous anyway. Every turn yielded thousands of every luxury, of which 999 was sold and the rest wasted

The Cravers came from the top arm of the galaxy, and were swiftly isolated. They have since been purged with Exotic Rations and the occasional Raze System, and their worlds are now populated with loyal Raian subjects.

Additional info:


Settings were Spiral-4, Medium Size, Normal Age, Unique Constellations, with 5 Hard competitors and normal speed.


The main thing I learnt doing this was that, no matter your race, don't ever neglect trade companies! Imagine how much crazier things could get once galaxy sizes larger than "Medium" become available.


0Send private message
8 years ago
Jan 5, 2017, 3:15:44 PM

@Strife and @SirBagel:


Good work here.

I see you both used a unique constellation. One trouble I'm having with trade routes and companies is that if I use a non-unique constellation galaxy setting, I can't get full advantage of them util I get the wormhole tech in Era III, so delaying my growth.

As I accept the way Amplitude did it (really no troubles with this), I just want to know: Have you ever reached something similar with a non-unique constellation galaxy? And if so, how you dealed with the wormhole tech? Have you simply rushed it when reaching Era III?


As side note: again impressed for the potential of trade routes, but actually bit worried with what is happening with luxuries.

May be more balanced make their growht more logarithmic than exponential?

Updated 8 years ago.
0Send private message
8 years ago
Jan 5, 2017, 3:59:47 PM
SirBagel wrote:

Peace with filthy aliens? Bah! Heresy!

That's the spirit! The Emperor protects.

0Send private message
8 years ago
Jan 5, 2017, 6:19:01 PM
mixerria wrote:
SirBagel wrote:

Peace with filthy aliens? Bah! Heresy!

That's the spirit! The Emperor protects.

Bah, a corpse sits upon the golden throne. Death to the false emperor!

0Send private message
8 years ago
Jan 5, 2017, 6:45:01 PM
lo_fabre wrote:

I see you both used a unique constellation. One trouble I'm having with trade routes and companies is that if I use a non-unique constellation galaxy setting, I can't get full advantage of them util I get the wormhole tech in Era III, so delaying my growth.

As I accept the way Amplitude did it (really no troubles with this), I just want to know: Have you ever reached something similar with a non-unique constellation galaxy? And if so, how you dealed with the wormhole tech? Have you simply rushed it when reaching Era III?

I haven't actually tried a game without unique constellations yet! I thought that setting was for whether unique features like Tor and Auriga spawned so I always left it on. If wormholes let you trade by connecting systems as normal, I don't think it'll delay you by much as era 3 is where you also get the tech for +2 subsidiaries, the +50% star system trade value improvement, and the unique +100% star system trade value building. Before that, trade income isn't a substantial ratio to other dust income - era 3 is where things start to truly ramp up. I also repeatedly scrap old trade subsidiaries and buy new ones at increasingly further locations throughout the game.


Then again, maybe I'm underestimating how much slower the first wave of colonization would be when travelling to unconnected systems, and also the delays from lesser trade company experience due to having to initially trade across closer distances and having less trade companies unlocked. Maybe it'll take 20-30 turns slower to achieve the same results? Either way, it is inevitable that you'll become filthy rich if you keep re-investing the entirety of your dust income!

0Send private message
8 years ago
Jan 5, 2017, 8:36:21 PM

Just gotta say, the fact that the numbers can get so huge so quickly in even a medium sized galaxy doesn't bode well to me. When trade routes grow, is it exponential? If so, that's bad for balance. I can see the trade route tech being more important over the medium-long term than any military tech for a supremacy game, which makes sense given that this is at least partially an empire development game, but perhaps might not be for the best.


You don't even need to control the entire galaxy to get ridiculous amounts of income, with control over a constellation you can have trade routes that absolutely blow any system income out of the water, making them disproportionately important for development in even medium-sized empires. The way they generate income is opaque, as well. It would be nice if there were a guide describing how trade route income is calculated.


Trade route income growth should be bounded in some way, so that developing trade routes isn't always the correct decision. Perhaps logarithmic growth?


Another thing: strategic and luxury resources shouldn't have a cap of 999, that's obviously a placeholder but still...

0Send private message
8 years ago
Jan 5, 2017, 9:40:56 PM
TheTakenKing wrote:

When trade routes grow, is it exponential? 

I made saves every 10 turns or so on that play-through, so I went back and checked. 


Turn 20 - (13)

Turn 31 - (46)

Turn 40 - 110

Turn 50 - (324) (yes it's negative, thanks to those silly events that impose dust penalties per system when I'm mounting a massive land grab)

Turn 61 - 591

Turn 70 - 2.6k

Turn 80 - 6.4k

Turn 90 - 16.6k

Turn 100 - 32.8k

Turn 110 - 60.6k

Turn 120 - 203.4k

Turn 127 - 491.2k


Also note that true income by turn 127 was closer to 1 million after selling all the luxuries that capped at 999. It might be more accurate to double the numbers for the later turns, although the increase does plateau eventually as more trade doesn't increase luxuries past 999.


Tl:dr - looks pretty exponential to me. Then again, military supremacy was effectively achieved by the 60's and the rest of the game was spent playing Sim city.

0Send private message
8 years ago
Jan 5, 2017, 9:45:24 PM
SirBagel wrote:
 I haven't actually tried a game without unique constellations yet! I thought that setting was for whether unique features like Tor and Auriga spawned so I always left it on. If wormholes let you trade by connecting systems as normal, [...].

Well if you pick non-unique constellations, they are separated, and until you unlock Era III tech for wormholes, you only have lanes between systems of same constellation, and have to travel within constellations using the free space moves.

As I like it for other game aspects, this collaterally implies you can't create trade routes implying different constellations until you are able to see wormholes.

For rest of paragraph thanks for your advise


Then again, maybe I'm underestimating how much slower the first wave of colonization would be when travelling to unconnected systems, and also the delays from lesser trade company experience due to having to initially trade across closer distances and having less trade companies unlocked. Maybe it'll take 20-30 turns slower to achieve the same results? Either way, it is inevitable that you'll become filthy rich if you keep re-investing the entirety of your dust income!

Yes, it delays you, but also allows you to grow taller before meeting aggressive factions. Also I feel this having lore-sense, remembers me of ES1 and found this make people compete to get first to free move/wormhole tech.

Also feel the actual way makes more sense than allowing trade routes across free space, or at least allowing them without a penalty. But this is a matter of taste.


TheTakenKing wrote:  

Just gotta say, the fact that the numbers can get so huge so quickly in even a medium sized galaxy doesn't bode well to me. When trade routes grow, is it exponential? If so, that's bad for balance. I can see the trade route tech being more important over the medium-long term than any military tech for a supremacy game, which makes sense given that this is at least partially an empire development game, but perhaps might not be for the best.

Same thought here.


[...] The way they generate income is opaque, as well. It would be nice if there were a guide describing how trade route income is calculated.

Yes. Lots of people around asking to make it clearer. Specially linking it to economic screen (recommend this idea), and giving this info more importance.

Actually the meaning of trade value in this screen is unclear, you can't see how this is affected by improvements or other factors. It seems you get more income from routes to systems with higher values, but not tested.


Trade route income growth should be bounded in some way, so that developing trade routes isn't always the correct decision. Perhaps logarithmic growth?

Same thought here, stated in last post. Maybe working it a bit there can be good thing to post in ideas section.


Another thing: strategic and luxury resources shouldn't have a cap of 999, that's obviously a placeholder but still...

Related to this, I felt this resource cap, not only arbitrary, but underused as potential game feature. Wrote this idea about playing with resource cap if you want to take a look.


Last, thanks again for your info and advise.

Updated 8 years ago.
0Send private message
8 years ago
Jan 5, 2017, 9:55:41 PM

With @SirBagel numbers:


This is exponential, or at least looks like it.

0Send private message
?

Click here to login

Reply
Comment