Logo Platform
logo amplifiers simplified

Intergalactic Technology Center

Reply
Copied to clipboard!
8 years ago
Mar 25, 2017, 3:18:02 AM

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but has the Intergalactic Technology Center (somehow abbreviated to ITER) always decreased SCI on Empire by 10%?


Currently, it adds 10% SCI per system level, but decreases SCI by 10% throughout the Empire.  I don't remember it being this way before the patch.  It was always something I thought worth building on a good SCI system, but with a large empire there's no way I'd build it now.

0Send private message
0Send private message
8 years ago
Mar 30, 2017, 8:51:50 PM

I agree, the -10% SCI throughout the Empire seems like too much of a penalty to justify building it in most situations. Although when I actually tested it out, I think I still got a decent net increase in Science from it, so that probably isn't the right complaint... (Also, apparently there isn't actually a -10% to the rest of the Empire applied.)


Rather, I would complain it's too hard to calculate whether it's an overall bonus or penalty, so we're tempted to just avoid building it. I would recommend using this instead:


  • 10% of Science from all other systems in Empire is transferred to this system instead (to symbolize scientists gathering in a center of learning)
  • +X% bonus to all Science in this system (including the transferred Science)

That way, you never have a situation where building the Intergalactic Technology Center actually hurts your science production.

Updated 8 years ago.
0Send private message
8 years ago
Mar 30, 2017, 9:45:47 PM

I think he's asking if it reduces your science output by 10% empire wide or if it makes all research cost 10% less.  It appears your saying that it's the former but honestly it would be nice if penalty were indicated with red text or something like negative anomaly's are red.

0Send private message
?

Click here to login

Reply
Comment