Logo Platform
logo amplifiers simplified

[Suggestion] Easy fix for planets

Reply
Copied to clipboard!
8 years ago
Oct 19, 2016, 2:12:02 PM

If we could order the planets from warmest -> coolest in a system, I think that'd be swell.  


It's weird to have an ice planet close to the sun and a lava planet further out


I believe gas giants are also more likely further from the star, larger orbital path + distance from the star = more stuff to suck up, but that's a little nitpicky even for me.

0Send private message
8 years ago
Oct 19, 2016, 2:56:43 PM

Got to admit that I do not really mind the randomness. 


There is not really a reason why a lava planet cant be in the outer edges of a young solar system. The heat and lava come because of the internal workings, not so much the external. Granted it would probably not make much sense if you pick an old galaxy as your choice... or at least it should be rare. 


Also as for gas giants. It is actually quite realistic to have them close to the star. Our solar system is kinda unique in that way. Many many exoplanet systems have super massive planets close to their stars rather than further out. It is actually harder to explain why we do not have it in ours. 






0Send private message
8 years ago
Oct 19, 2016, 4:54:23 PM
Aiyen wrote:

Also as for gas giants. It is actually quite realistic to have them close to the star. Our solar system is kinda unique in that way. Many many exoplanet systems have super massive planets close to their stars rather than further out. It is actually harder to explain why we do not have it in ours. 



That's interesting, I wasn't sure about that part.  


WRT the heat of the planets: I'm not saying you couldn't have a lava plant far from a star in a newer solar system, but you wouldn't ALSO have an ice planet closer in I don't think.  

0Send private message
8 years ago
Oct 19, 2016, 5:38:10 PM

Hey there! I moved this to Game Design as it's a suggestion ;)

0Send private message
8 years ago
Oct 19, 2016, 5:44:23 PM

What would make more sense (since distance is relative) is that colder planets do not happen to appear near blue super giant stars (Those things are freaking hot!)... or other hot main sequence stars. 

They should probably be limited to mainly appear near older, colder stars. Would make it more realistic, and it should be easy enough to implement. 



Updated 8 years ago.
0Send private message
8 years ago
Oct 19, 2016, 7:48:24 PM

well if it has a face locked to the sun and the other one never shone upon it can get cold (i think that we may see hybrid planets if the future anyway)

0Send private message
8 years ago
Oct 20, 2016, 2:42:52 AM
Aiyen wrote:

What would make more sense (since distance is relative) is that colder planets do not happen to appear near blue super giant stars (Those things are freaking hot!)... or other hot main sequence stars. 

They should probably be limited to mainly appear near older, colder stars. Would make it more realistic, and it should be easy enough to implement. 



Distance is relative, as you said. An ice world could exist both around a dwarf star and a blue giant, only at different distances. Keep also in mind that the average temperature of a planet is mostly determined by optical factors : how much light is reflected away or absorbed by the ground and the atmosphere; how much heat is radiated away and how much is reflected back by the atmosphere. For example, Venus has a average temperature of 735 degrees Kelvin while Mercury's temperature peaks at 700 Kelvins during the day (and dips at just 100 Kelvins during the night).


Some models also suggest that Earth might have been a frozen world, covered in ice from pole to pole. This is because ice reflects more sunlight into space than water, meaning that growing ice sheets would cool down the planet further, creation a positive feedback or chain-reaction that ends in total ice coverage.


Global temperature fell so low that the equator was as cold as modern-day Antarctica.[54] This low temperature was maintained by the high albedo of the ice sheets, which reflected most incoming solar energy into space. A lack of heat-retaining clouds, caused by water vapor freezing out of the atmosphere, amplified this effect.          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowball_Earth

Cyclic increases in solar activity or similar cosmic phenomenons could never reverse that process, nor can decreases in the sun's intensity cool down Venus. The most likely hypothesis is that temperatures only rised when volcanic activity dramatically increased the atmospheric concentration of CO2, sounding the return of a strong greenhouse effect. Without geothermic activity (a feature many planets lack), Earth would have been a Pale White Dot forever.

Updated 8 years ago.
0Send private message
?

Click here to login

Reply
Comment