Logo Platform
logo amplifiers simplified

Research tree is out of sync with game pace

Reply
Copied to clipboard!
8 years ago
Oct 28, 2016, 11:08:21 AM

Hello again

This is the feedback based on EA 1.3


After playing quite a bunch of games now I can say that the research tree just feels completely out of sync with game pace, especially if you play aggressively Craver-style.

But even if you if you are not warmongering, it has same issues.


1) Research eras belong in their rightful place... Endless Legend series, not Endless Space


Guys you know the first development rule, right? 

"If it ain't broken, don't fix it"

The decision to drop the responsive and fluid research web from Endless Space 1 and replace it with limited Eras from Endless Legend is probably the worst design decision ever made for the series.

The ES1 web was extremely responsive to the needs of player, you could make paths as much as you liked, you could beeline or take detours back and forth and in general always find some answers to the ever-changing situations you were in.

You could push early development, go into naval power, get some techs for ground invasions, run along for some luxuries, back to naval power and so on and on. 

The process was fluid, it required constant decision-making on the fly, and in general made game more interactive.


With the limited picks you have to get from Eras, none of these elements are present.

On top of it, you locked the most basic and crucial system development elements into so late eras, they are basically worthless and pointless by the time you can get them.

You require to spend a research era point for *each* planet colonization type, 4 of each in every era, that is basically deleting 4 points out of 10 and leaving only 6 for player to decide what to pick.


You do realize, that it is literally impossible to pass colonizations techs if you have those planet types around (and there are always different types of planets around, even in Tiny galaxy) , since skipping a whole productive planet is insane loss of income, none of the other techs can make up for?


So in these 6 picks you leave to player are Food/Science/Production/Dust/Influence buildings, usually 2-3 of each type.

That forces player to make a sacrificial choice to completely ignore at least 2 directions and stick with 2-3 other.

To make it even worse, you tie all food/ecological building into Happiness, which is a MUST have, otherwise the player's system will go into cardiac arrest, either from his colonization or from his captured war efforts. Which effectively locks up 1 more choice.

So in the end, you leave player a choice to develop only 2 points of research how to develop his systems. Two. Out of "ten".

This is extremely poor and limited system, which does not make player make any meaningful choices. All it leaves is a sense frustration as you have to completely ignore all dust-generation techs and push Happiness.

In general it is completely impossible and meaningless to pick any special weapons techs, since they take valuable research era slots and not giving anything in return. A 10% increase in modules power is totally not worth it compared to missing entire research line of production buildings, for instance.


2) Planetary exploitations were free cheap help for early game... now they come ways too late into play


The whole point of these weak and cheap early exploitations was to help player fix his development problems.

In general it was all about food while the systems are setting up, and then switch to production/dust/science accordingly to how the system was going to be specialized.

You have put food exploitation into Era2, behind a 1700+ cost technology.

You must understand, that the very first technologies any player have to do in era2 is upgraded ship hulls + fleet size, to keep up with naval competition, right? Especially against a hard/endless AI or human players.

That means that you have the courtesy to research planetary food exploitation only after researching  2-3 techs deep in Era2.

Which is quite deep into midgame already. By this time, with governors and whatnot, most of the systems the player had initially  settled are FULL on population.  Same for capturing systems from AI - they are all overpopulated already.

Which makes entire point of having food exploitation meaningless.

The only scenario to use this tech now is to keep building *something* for ecologists, to get that goddamn ecology Hero pop up in Academy finally.

Which also concern all of the food/farming buildings - they are so late in tech tree and so expensive, that they are not needed by that time.

And as additional pun, there is ecology farm building which only works on "Happy/Ecstatic", although most players are going for Ecology to get the equalizer law to put systems on "Content" to stop their pops from going into cardiac arrest from expansion.


Same goes for Industrial exploitation. It is in era2, waiting in line after ships and food. By the time players get it, they have probably already built the next level base with +50 production. A more or less productive system with just some terran/tundra and a tropical planet, with level 10 governor is pushing about 400 production. The extra 20 production from this exploitation, which could have really helped in early game (when it was like 5-6 pops on planet), now looks like a joke to even spend a research point on.

To top the cake, since you have took away free production conversions, usually by that time there is literally nothing to build anyway.

Why not? Remember what I said about limited research choices? That's correct, since player has only 6 realistic picks each era besides 4 colonization techs, there are not much buildings at all.

Most of the time you just pack the production queue with those several buildings you researched and then it's done, the system has nothing to do. To make it produce anything, you need to spend research points again on conversions, which are never a pick because you just unlocked era3 and have to research ships again. The circle continues.


3) Production conversions belong in their rightful place... from start of the game in our production queue


You put the very basic and most needed mechanic so deep into research tree it is practically comical.

How did you make the decision to put conversion of production into science into research Era3? Which is effectively lategame already?

There is literally nothing left to research by the time you get there.

In Endless Space 1 it was a clear tactic to set up your systems from the start depending on planets they had spawned - production systems, dust systems, science systems.


Early production exploitation helped to overcome simple nuances like - when the planet is obviously meant for science, trying to produce anything on it was horrible slow, and never made sense, the best use was to slap production -> science conversion, and come back to it only when you researched a new science building.


As it is right now, the systems are idle most of the time while the player must chew through colonization techs, then ship techs, and only then, if he decides to FORFEIT some crucial buildings like influence/pop or dust/pop, he can afford to research conversions.


4) A special word about weapon techs


For the love of God, put into description of weapon techs what kind of weapons and modules they actually unlock. 

It feels lame researching that tier1 titanium tech only to find out all it gives is lasers and shields, when I do not fit any of those.


In general, I find it very disheartening that these design decisions even made it into the game.

And since they are in this EA already, there is very little chance for any logical rework.

All in all, the direction to make "Endless Legend in space" instead of proper sequel of your first awesome game guys is truly disappointing.

Updated 8 years ago.
0Send private message
8 years ago
Oct 28, 2016, 11:38:36 AM

I think you make a lot of good points, although I don't share your pessimism about Amplitude's ability to re-work and iterate until they have good mechanics in place. Devs said that this is an alpha version of the game so they have time to experiment with different ideas. I haven't paid a great deal of attention to the tech tree discussions elsewhere on the forum (beyond agreeing that it's not fit for purpose and waiting for the next iteration from the devs), but what you say about planetary exploitations and industry conversion is spot on. Baseline versions of these technologies should be available at the start of the game, with enhancements possibly researched later on, just like in ES1 where it worked really well.

0Send private message
8 years ago
Oct 28, 2016, 12:03:02 PM

These are good points, I mused about the same things here, the current technology system is one that let us feel like hitting roadblocks from the very start of the game.


I personnaly don't like much the era system, but it may be salveageable. A tech tree or pool can be sucessful or broken depending of the numbers (and other tweaks). The main issue with the current design is how basic things are seemingly locked away in hard to reach eras. This is not the only system that feels like this, take hero skill points, it's basically the same : pick most of stuff in a tier before getting things in a new tier. 

ES1 tech tree felt a tad too interdependant to my taste, limiting us in another fashion. We won't kid ourselves, conflict is a big part of these games and in case of the ES serie, there isn't many way to go to war : you need hulls, strategic resources, command points, and weapon techs. That leaves very few space for creativity here... (especially when level 2 hulls already use 4 cp AND use titanium/hyperium...) I don't have much hope about this, but it will be a burden on the science system in any case.


As you said in your point 2, we lack very useful tools that only happen to be unlocked by era II. But at this stage you will require indeed some other important techs and each one get costlier. 

There is one thing I don't mind : nor the ability, nor the need to build everything in every system. The development phase in ES1 was a bit too straightforward to my taste. But here you're basically encouraged to start cramming ships very early in the game. the food exploitation especially does come too late, due to the rare planets slots being filled already. 


As for point 3 : I agree too. I wouldn't mind it to come late, if we didn't run out of interesting stuff to build in our systems so quickly. Apart from the very start of the Sophon play, I've felt the technology lagging behind my expansion/industry. 


Point 4 could be solved by a new tech UI, with 2 need features : having more than 2 unlocks for each tech, and letting us see in a "endlesspedia" screen, the details of a technology. This would allow you to add meta science info, like possible "links" between different techs. 


My general take on this science design is we aren't given the choice to make tradeoffs in efficiency, but rather skipping entire functions of the game. 

You can't have minimal exchange with other factions, it's negotiation tech or nothing (era II)

You can't badly use your excess industry.

You can't use at all luxuries before system upgrades tech

You can't use a planet at all before its tech, not even outposts for industry/military/science/influence purpose

You almost can't invade at all (even smallish systems) without invasion modules (era II)

You can't change your governement at all before era II (and only 2 laws available)

Trade before era II ? forget it.

etc


I missed in ES1 the feeling of getting new "toys" and abilities the further I went into the tree, as in units doing new things, for instance,  this and the lack of serious tradeoff in improvement, made the progression in a game kinda unexciting for me. So I don't mind a new approch that gives real new possibilities the further you are into the tech tree - as opposed of only more system with biffer outputs and harder hitting units, but as ES2 stands right now, we are grasping for stuff to do in the early game, often the most intersting phase of any 4X. 




Updated 8 years ago.
0Send private message
8 years ago
Oct 28, 2016, 7:51:08 PM
uriak wrote:

These are good points, I mused about the same things here, the current technology system is one that let us feel like hitting roadblocks from the very start of the game.


I personnaly don't like much the era system, but it may be salveageable. A tech tree or pool can be sucessful or broken depending of the numbers (and other tweaks). The main issue with the current design is how basic things are seemingly locked away in hard to reach eras. This is not the only system that feels like this, take hero skill points, it's basically the same : pick most of stuff in a tier before getting things in a new tier. 

ES1 tech tree felt a tad too interdependant to my taste, limiting us in another fashion. We won't kid ourselves, conflict is a big part of these games and in case of the ES serie, there isn't many way to go to war : you need hulls, strategic resources, command points, and weapon techs. That leaves very few space for creativity here... (especially when level 2 hulls already use 4 cp AND use titanium/hyperium...) I don't have much hope about this, but it will be a burden on the science system in any case.


As you said in your point 2, we lack very useful tools that only happen to be unlocked by era II. But at this stage you will require indeed some other important techs and each one get costlier. 

There is one thing I don't mind : nor the ability, nor the need to build everything in every system. The development phase in ES1 was a bit too straightforward to my taste. But here you're basically encouraged to start cramming ships very early in the game. the food exploitation especially does come too late, due to the rare planets slots being filled already. 


As for point 3 : I agree too. I wouldn't mind it to come late, if we didn't run out of interesting stuff to build in our systems so quickly. Apart from the very start of the Sophon play, I've felt the technology lagging behind my expansion/industry. 


Point 4 could be solved by a new tech UI, with 2 need features : having more than 2 unlocks for each tech, and letting us see in a "endlesspedia" screen, the details of a technology. This would allow you to add meta science info, like possible "links" between different techs. 


My general take on this science design is we aren't given the choice to make tradeoffs in efficiency, but rather skipping entire functions of the game. 

You can't have minimal exchange with other factions, it's negotiation tech or nothing (era II)

You can't badly use your excess industry.

You can't use at all luxuries before system upgrades tech

You can't use a planet at all before its tech, not even outposts for industry/military/science/influence purpose

You almost can't invade at all (even smallish systems) without invasion modules (era II)

You can't change your governement at all before era II (and only 2 laws available)

Trade before era II ? forget it.

etc


I missed in ES1 the feeling of getting new "toys" and abilities the further I went into the tree, as in units doing new things, for instance,  this and the lack of serious tradeoff in improvement, made the progression in a game kinda unexciting for me. So I don't mind a new approch that gives real new possibilities the further you are into the tech tree - as opposed of only more system with biffer outputs and harder hitting units, but as ES2 stands right now, we are grasping for stuff to do in the early game, often the most intersting phase of any 4X. 





Yes, exactly man! Very nice points

We are not choosing options here.

We skip entire part of crucial game functions!

And without those, the actual management becomes a chore of limited options, instead of sensible solutions to my current situation.


- Whole Diplomacy and Trading is locked by techs in Era II, omg? 

So if I met someone right next to me early game, I literally have no options to make friends until I plow into Era II, research ships+fleet size, because everyone is pillaging my stuff without Diplomacy, and only then I can think about diplomacy and trading? We have been through 2 wars by now!


- Additional law slots available only to Senate/Democracy, lol?

So, what about all other Empires? We are limited to 2 law slots the entire game? How is that even interesting?


And in general, the sense of emptiness keeps taking over as you research further - there is less and less things to do in systems, up the point where majority of midgame your systems are not doing anything at all - nonproductive systems are bad to make ships, and you have no time to research conversion techs.


0Send private message
8 years ago
Oct 28, 2016, 11:18:32 PM
I agree with this list, top to bottom. You are incorrect about nothing being able to change in Early Access though. Amplitude has pulled off amazing changes in there before.
0Send private message
8 years ago
Oct 29, 2016, 5:55:24 PM
Romeo wrote:
I agree with this list, top to bottom. You are incorrect about nothing being able to change in Early Access though. Amplitude has pulled off amazing changes in there before.

Oh man, I really hope so.

Some implementations (tech tree, fleet and ground combat) are very questionable.

0Send private message
8 years ago
Oct 30, 2016, 1:42:04 AM
Asuzu wrote:
Romeo wrote:
I agree with this list, top to bottom. You are incorrect about nothing being able to change in Early Access though. Amplitude has pulled off amazing changes in there before.

Oh man, I really hope so.

Some implementations (tech tree, fleet and ground combat) are very questionable.

Unfortunately, seems like they're hellbent on using that useless Era nonsense, they're only going to be "tweaking it". The other two apparently have some fairly large changes coming, according to the list they did up.

0Send private message
8 years ago
Oct 30, 2016, 2:47:38 AM
Romeo wrote:
Asuzu wrote:
Romeo wrote:
I agree with this list, top to bottom. You are incorrect about nothing being able to change in Early Access though. Amplitude has pulled off amazing changes in there before.

Oh man, I really hope so.

Some implementations (tech tree, fleet and ground combat) are very questionable.

Unfortunately, seems like they're hellbent on using that useless Era nonsense, they're only going to be "tweaking it". The other two apparently have some fairly large changes coming, according to the list they did up.


God damn it.

Well, I expect this one to fail anyway, so they will re-implement tech web in EL2, just for giggles

0Send private message
8 years ago
Oct 30, 2016, 6:26:15 PM
There is always the possibility of modding  a regular tech tree into the game ;) As i understand the GDD they will be adding tech tree style links for some technologies so it should theoretically be possible. Granted that would probably also require that we are given enough flexibility to alter individual techs sufficiently, as they may not be as suitable for a regular tech tree, if they are designed with an era system in mind.
But let us wait and see what they come up with maybe the final tweaked era tech system will be better than expected by some or they surprise everybody and go a different route ;)
0Send private message
8 years ago
Oct 30, 2016, 6:32:53 PM
AndreasK wrote:
There is always the possibility of modding  a regular tech tree into the game ;) As i understand the GDD they will be adding tech tree style links for some technologies so it should theoretically be possible. Granted that would probably also require that we are given enough flexibility to alter individual techs sufficiently, as they may not be as suitable for a regular tech tree, if they are designed with an era system in mind.
But let us wait and see what they come up with maybe the final tweaked era tech system will be better than expected by some or they surprise everybody and go a different route ;)


Yeah I guess, since they said 3 weeks for next update, let's see what they come up with.

0Send private message
8 years ago
Oct 31, 2016, 5:56:04 PM
AndreasK wrote:
There is always the possibility of modding  a regular tech tree into the game ;) As i understand the GDD they will be adding tech tree style links for some technologies so it should theoretically be possible. Granted that would probably also require that we are given enough flexibility to alter individual techs sufficiently, as they may not be as suitable for a regular tech tree, if they are designed with an era system in mind.
But let us wait and see what they come up with maybe the final tweaked era tech system will be better than expected by some or they surprise everybody and go a different route ;)

Here's hoping, but that seems like a truly monumental amount of change to the game (Would require changing almost every single aspect of the tech system, huge code changes and a completely new UI for it). I think it's safe to say it's outside the scope of our fairly small modding community.

0Send private message
8 years ago
Oct 31, 2016, 6:13:17 PM
Romeo wrote:

Here's hoping, but that seems like a truly monumental amount of change to the game (Would require changing almost every single aspect of the tech system, huge code changes and a completely new UI for it). I think it's safe to say it's outside the scope of our fairly small modding community.

Depends on the modding infrastructure they end up delivering. Having a good modding support can greatly increase the shelf life of a game, and give the developers great ideas for future releases. Deliver a great modding support and a big modding community will probably follow ;)

0Send private message
8 years ago
Nov 1, 2016, 11:43:48 AM

1) Research eras belong in their rightful place... Endless Legend series, not Endless Space

The process was fluid, it required constant decision-making on the fly, and in general made game more interactive.

No; the process are complex and confusing. The player must read all the fucking tree for know what research.
On the other hand... i dont like the new tree, too. Is confusing and have things without sense, that is true. A tree research must be simple and easy of read and understand, not complex and full of decisions because that is heavy for the brain of players.

2) Planetary exploitations were free cheap help for early game... now they come ways too late into play

3) Production conversions belong in their rightful place... from start of the game in our production queue

4) A special word about weapon techs

I agree. This have sense.

Updated 8 years ago.
0Send private message
8 years ago
Nov 1, 2016, 6:17:14 PM
AndreasK wrote:
Romeo wrote:

Here's hoping, but that seems like a truly monumental amount of change to the game (Would require changing almost every single aspect of the tech system, huge code changes and a completely new UI for it). I think it's safe to say it's outside the scope of our fairly small modding community.

Depends on the modding infrastructure they end up delivering. Having a good modding support can greatly increase the shelf life of a game, and give the developers great ideas for future releases. Deliver a great modding support and a big modding community will probably follow ;)

Here's hoping, but we'll have to see. I'm not expecting more than we usually get, which is just XML editing.

minurominerwin wrote:

1) Research eras belong in their rightful place... Endless Legend series, not Endless Space

The process was fluid, it required constant decision-making on the fly, and in general made game more interactive.

No; the process are complex and confusing. The player must read all the fucking tree for know what research.
On the other hand... i dont like the new tree, too. Is confusing and have things without sense, that is true. A tree research must be simple and easy of read and understand, not complex and full of decisions because that is heavy for the brain of players.

2) Planetary exploitations were free cheap help for early game... now they come ways too late into play

3) Production conversions belong in their rightful place... from start of the game in our production queue

4) A special word about weapon techs

I agree. This have sense.

Language please. Also, this is 4X, the tech tree should require a bit of legwork and experimentation. You don't start Civilization as an expert on how to develop. You play around with it, learn what leads to what and then let that influence your decisions next time you play. Complexity is not the enemy here, this is 4X. Complexity is a very good thing to have.

0Send private message
8 years ago
Nov 1, 2016, 9:09:45 PM
minurominerwin wrote:


No; the process are complex and confusing. The player must read all the fucking tree for know what research.
On the other hand... i dont like the new tree, too. Is confusing and have things without sense, that is true. A tree research must be simple and easy of read and understand, not complex and full of decisions because that is heavy for the brain of players.

But being full of complex decisions is the core idea of strategy games!


I agree completely that every game needs a clear user interface as well as simple access to information. Similarly, the direct consequences of any decisions you make should be simple to understand (in the short term). But the things that makes this game a game is how you plan for the later turns, how you take advantage of circumstances and how you choose an appropriate strategy to face the challenges you face.


You don't have to read the entire tech tree to play either, as long as you make good choices based on what you know and need right now. A well-designed tree will make it obvious what kind of bonuses await you up the branches just by looking at what lays at its roots. Certainly ES1's tech tree was a bit flawed in that sense, but the current one does no better, as it's really hard to see why one technology is in a certain field and not another. If there were a linear progression in the current technologies, it'd be a massive mess, not to mention how it hides info like what kind of weapons are unlocked by a tech. That's unnecessary guesswork and the main factor responsible for confusion or decision paralysis.

Updated 8 years ago.
0Send private message
8 years ago
Nov 2, 2016, 8:47:02 AM

Language please. Also, this is 4X, the tech tree should require a bit of legwork and experimentation. You don't start Civilization as an expert on how to develop. You play around with it, learn what leads to what and then let that influence your decisions next time you play. Complexity is not the enemy here, this is 4X. Complexity is a very good thing to have.

Yes, the complexity can be good. But depend of how is exposed in the game. The complexity should contribute to be the game rich and variety. Not be confusing for the player, if so, is bad.
The tree of endless space 1 (the ES2 do this better) does not encourage me for experiment. It have too many options and similar to each other. 
Civilization have a better tree, because it is better presented, and is more easy of understand.


But being full of complex decisions is the core idea of strategy games!

I agree at all. But the game can not be complex at the expense of the player. If it is complex, you require a simplistic presentation and a good difficulty curve that grows throughout the game. If in the early, you start with a whole tree of options, this will tide and overwhelms you.
Have limitations in the early (in the research tree, like civilization or ES2) not remove the variety, necessarily. In this case, it is necessary for the player to enter heat and understand the game.

I'm not an expert in strategy games like you, guys (without anger), in fact I am a very bad player. But still, I like the strategy. And this I say, is a problem that frightens many players like me who try to play a game of strategy, but should exploit their brain reading and experimenting thousand similar options with each other, to find out what tactic is more optimal to win.

0Send private message
?

Click here to login

Reply
Comment