Logo Platform
logo amplifiers simplified

FIDSI planet quiz (Traitor's Rea 1)

Reply
Copied to clipboard!
4 years ago
Jan 25, 2021, 10:19:04 AM

Planet name:Traitor's Reach 1

Pop: 5 Imperials

Planet base output: 9-3-4-4-0

So 5*12=60. So how 55 is calculated? What do i miss? Maybe we feed traitors less?

System improvement: Epigenegtics Crop Seeding / 2f per pop


Updated 4 years ago.
0Send private message
4 years ago
Jan 25, 2021, 11:12:19 AM

You have 5x9 (45) base production + 5x1 because of anomaly and 5x2 because you build the crop improvemt. A total of 60. As long as 5 pop consume 1 food each per turn it's a total of 55 food, not?

0Send private message
4 years ago
Jan 25, 2021, 1:09:36 PM

Strange. I thougth another possible answer.

Food is 8 base plus 1 from anomaly plus 2 from system improvement = 11 thus x5 = 55

0Send private message
4 years ago
Jan 25, 2021, 2:14:31 PM
Pretty sure Groo is correct that the Planet Base Output doesn't include the +1 from the anomaly
0Send private message
4 years ago
Jan 28, 2021, 10:18:46 PM

I dont think pop's consumed food will be counted in the planets FIDSI stats.

See anether example:


0Send private message
4 years ago
Jan 28, 2021, 11:13:18 PM

Would be useful to know more about the population you have on this planet. I.e. Riftborn population doesn't need food.

0Send private message
4 years ago
Jan 29, 2021, 9:54:02 PM

Indeed , there is consumption , but is displayed in the System  panel info , not in the planet info .

0Send private message
0Send private message
4 years ago
Jan 30, 2021, 3:41:37 PM

I think there was misunderstanding. The stats in my initial thread post are from the planet, not from the system , so the consumption argument is not valid.

0Send private message
4 years ago
Jan 30, 2021, 7:18:58 PM

According to wiki default food value for Terran planet is 8, so the 9 in screenshot is native 8 + 1 from anomaly, + 2 from improvement it's 11, so it checks out.


Same for Raia in second example, default Terran yield is 8-3-4-4, but it shows output already taking into account the modifiers, which makes sense, though the wording may be confusing.

0Send private message
?

Click here to login

Reply
Comment

Characters : 0
No results
0Send private message