When I enable Auto-Explore, on Turn 1, the scout will beeline it straight to the food no matter how many times I reload the save it will ALWAYS go straight for the food because it can't reach the science in a single turn due to the forests.
For Turn 2 there was some RNG between tests. Sometimes a science curiosity will spawn in between the original 2 at one of two locations (more often than not it's A.) I circled the spawns in the second screenshot below. After grabbing this spawn the scout proceeds to the science to the right as expected but is exhausted before it can get there.
This leads many to believe that the Auto-Explore pathfinding "cheats" by ignoring the Fog of War, and they're not wrong to assume this, I certainly did. However, I noticed some odd inconsistencies with this assumption in mind which lead me run these tests. Multiple sequences were tested and it wasn't long before one scenario tripped my confirmation bias.
Watch what happens if I manually move 1 tile to the Northeast, then enable auto-explore on Turn 1.
Well, if you look closely both spawns aren't equidistant, B is closer. I think Auto-Explore is simply choosing the closest spawn. Otherwise the scout should have gone to the right towards the science no? Either right of the horses or right into the desert both would land the scout adjacent to it. Another thing worth noting here is vision. I suspect the scout relies on vision to make these judgement calls. It doesn't move from A to B in screenshot #5. It moved south onto the horses. Possibly due to the fact that when it grabbed A it revealed B and can see that B is empty.
The AI clearly knows exactly where all these curiosity spawns are and appears to prioritize the closest one. Which is probably why scouts don't actually explore and just bounce between curiosities. However, this does not necessarily mean that a curiosity has actually spawned there or that AI can see through FoW. For further proof of this theory I submit one more screenshot, but first I want to elaborate about vision a little. If simply having vision of a tile disables its spawner, or removes it from a list of "viable targets" for auto-explore because it's empty, it would explain most of the behaviors we see. Particularly as your empire expands and curiosities dry up. We've all probably witnessed scouts that can't yet embark completely lose their minds when it can't find / get to a curiosity. The feature breaks.
Now, onto that screenshot I mentioned.
I tried the FoW mod on this save. The original 2 curiosities are still there because I created the map without the mod. For those unaware, if you use this mod curiosities don't spawn. This combined with mid-to-late game observations is what leads me to believe curiosities only spawn in areas that empires don't have vision.
Well, that's something... They certainly prioritized the food when they could see it, but not when they couldn't? That's not what should happen if this feature "cheats."
Now, you could argue that this still counts as cheating and that's valid. The AI clearly has information that you're not privy to. I would argue that it's not cheating. The game needs some information for this feature to exist and function. It doesn't need to know everything though. Just the available spawn locations.
Here is the save in case you want to replicate this behavior yourself:
Joke aside, thanks for sharing, and I decided to do the same, and write my first message, after years here without a word (don't expect something fancy)
1) I am fine with the current auto-explore too, but I have even more reasons to that. What is the aim of auto-explore? Spend less time on micro management to let the player focus on important choices. Like many things in Amplitude games, to be honest, and I really like that. If the auto-explore was blind, people would probably... Do it manually, each turn, until they have visibility everywhere... What a nightmare! (with all due respect for people not using this feature of course :) )
2) As a developer, I think it is a ... Clever design! Where your unit should explore? Unexplored area... And where does curiosities generates? Outside of your field of view... That is doing both path-finding and curiosities exploration with a single algorithm. But it has one weakness, what happens when curiosities appears 1 hexa to far, in the ocean? RIP (not tested yet, but prevented a scout from doing something silly once). Or when no curiosities are generating? Do they used invisible curiosities only created for path-finding? Maybe I will make some tests too one day.
3) So as demonstrated G4M5T3R, your scouts will beeline straight to curiosities. Fine. What's the connection with AI and cheating? Because for me, the AI doesn't know where are the curiosities, only the units know that. Because it is not controlled by AI, but but the unit path-finding. And is it cheating? Well, when you play chess, The Pawn is much more limited than your Bishop... But since both players have 2 of them, it is totally balanced, right? Only my opinion: this is not cheating, and manual exploration will sometimes be more effective (better view if you climb a hill, better at dogding aggression, and far better at discovering new territories. This is something too consider!)
4) Thanks for this game. Yeah sorry, first message here, I had to say it. After my second playthrough, I won doing no pollution, against bad industries and nuclear geeks, I had a lot of fun (and stronger emotions sometimes). But seeing a ferret on Mars, and having the narrator saying "you showed them that you could beat them without polluting", Having 8 hours of new FlyByNo appropriate music, and many more like this, ... That made me really happy :D
Now, like the others, I will just wait to see how far the devs will push Humankind with updates and DLCs...
Sorry, to clarify: When I referred to the AI I meant pathfinding. I figured that it could be used synonymously in this context because you're letting the game make the decisions for you. The argument that many have made (perhaps not on these forums) is that pathfinding is cheating. That it knows exactly where and when a curiosity has spawned. It has knowledge that you do not and therefor is meta. Simply knowing where spawns are possible gives the feature an advantage over manual exploration, but not as big of an advantage as many would like to believe.
It's targeting empty spawns and wasting moves. Hence the infamous U-Turn.
Oh, ok. Well, if you call that "sense food", it become a feature/skill! Honestly, the only thing I don't really like about it is when multiple units are going to the same direction, that is a bit silly :) I can understand why it is not popular, but if the opposite choice was made, "blind explore", I feel it would be far worst. Only my opinion again. I would also enjoy a 3 status exploration mode, with standing / find curiosities / explore (ignoring curiosities), so I could use that to send ships discovering the maps. In another hand, that would be ruining part of the fun,
Oh, ok. Well, if you call that "sense food", it become a feature/skill!
Exactly xD
I think the misconception stems from people having previous experience with similar, but very different, features in other 4X games. It's been a while, so feel free to correct me if I am wrong, but in the recent Civ games the auto-explore prioritizes unveiling the fog no? Well, it makes sense in HK for scouts to maintain a list of [possibleCuriositySpawns] because curiosities are such an integral part of the game. The entire neo era revolves around them! Honestly, props to the devs! It's more work to make FoW influence pathfinding the usual shortcut is to "cheat," but the devs found a happy middleground ground here.
Thanks. I wanted to update the pics first to show the pathfinding weights of each possible move the scout could/should make. E.G: In pic #8, before enabling auto-explore, the weights from left to right - Food/A spawn/B spawn/Science would be 4/4/3/4 respectively, but in order to do that I'd either have to trick Steam into uploading my edits or change where they are hosted and it was 10PM... lol
I might still update them, or run a few more tests to demonstrate this.
G4M5T3R
Newcomer
G4M5T3R
Newcomer
100g2g ptsReport comment
Why do you report G4M5T3R?
Are you sure you want to block G4M5T3R ?
BlockCancelAre you sure you want to unblock G4M5T3R ?
UnblockCancelglobule
Amoeba Musician
globule
Amoeba Musician
19 900g2g ptsReport comment
Why do you report globule?
Are you sure you want to block globule ?
BlockCancelAre you sure you want to unblock globule ?
UnblockCancelG4M5T3R
Newcomer
G4M5T3R
Newcomer
100g2g ptsReport comment
Why do you report G4M5T3R?
Are you sure you want to block G4M5T3R ?
BlockCancelAre you sure you want to unblock G4M5T3R ?
UnblockCancelglobule
Amoeba Musician
globule
Amoeba Musician
19 900g2g ptsReport comment
Why do you report globule?
Are you sure you want to block globule ?
BlockCancelAre you sure you want to unblock globule ?
UnblockCancelG4M5T3R
Newcomer
G4M5T3R
Newcomer
100g2g ptsReport comment
Why do you report G4M5T3R?
Are you sure you want to block G4M5T3R ?
BlockCancelAre you sure you want to unblock G4M5T3R ?
UnblockCancelshasho
Space Dust
shasho
Space Dust
24 100g2g ptsReport comment
Why do you report shasho?
Are you sure you want to block shasho ?
BlockCancelAre you sure you want to unblock shasho ?
UnblockCancelG4M5T3R
Newcomer
G4M5T3R
Newcomer
100g2g ptsReport comment
Why do you report G4M5T3R?
Are you sure you want to block G4M5T3R ?
BlockCancelAre you sure you want to unblock G4M5T3R ?
UnblockCancel