aerothgow wrote:

the hissho are fine. they just need the mining bug fix.

the only thing need fixing is the damn behemots.

How is completely ignoring overcolonization penalties, morale penalties for secondary party representatives and mutinious state after conquering a system FINE?! There is no drawback for conquering a system after system and it is simply not right, it is not balanced and it is not logical and it is not honorable. Occupying a system should at least cost a set amount of Keii to somehow compensate for the lack of mutinous state.

Please, elaborate.

but you are very restricted in colonizing. you have to conquer. that is a very risky way of getting better.

Gzar wrote:

But the whole point was that once you start conquering the whole system breaks down because you start to snowball super hard. For hissho the conquered system is immediately at full morale and productivity and you don't have to wait 20 turns to get full ownership like others. You also start getting tons of keii at that point. They have the highest FIDS by turn 30 and then they grow even faster because of conquering snowball with instant returns and tons of keii. Other races can conquer too but they'll tank their happiness very quickly with overcolonization and low morale due to low ownership systems so they'll have to stop conquering pretty quickly. But hissho just keep going forever and they even GAIN morale and more bonuses for fighting from keii. There is no way anybody else can keep up with that.

What bugs me is it sounds like Hissos are better at being Cravers than Cravers :/

Maybe if it was more worthwhile for them to raze systems instead of conquering ? That would seem to fit their lore better imo.

What if, if you are over your colonization limit, it costs Keii to conquer systems?