Release of Cultures of Oceania and Bonny Update

Love this update and DLC! Although I am curious why you decided to give the Rapa Nui a Māori emblematic unit? Personally I would have named them Tangata Manu.

You guys are doing really great. I'm an old time Civilization player, started playing this genre since Civ2 and has played all the titles/expansions till date by Sid Meiers and have also played Call to Power by Activision. And the new concept you have brought in Humandkind is indeed far superior to the base Civilization Series. When you launched this game it was indeed an unfinished product with lots of serious issues. Also, lack of few cultures became a nuisance if a player chose to play 10 players' single player game in the hardest difficulties. Because then we could only play about same set of cultures every consecutive games. By solving lots of issues, and by bringing more and more cultures into the game, you've really nailed the concept. 

One thing I have started feeling here that I would like to share. Although the game concept is extremely good, I personally think that an era length is kind of very short for many cultures. I know the game allows us to continue a culture for another era, very few can actually do this for the availability of a superior culture or simply for a new emblem building, as early game influence is really important and EB's help in increasing those by a great margin.  

Another thing here - since the game was launched certain cultures proven to be stronger than others. And you've nerfed those cultures, while buffing the other weaker cultures. Not a bad idea. But realistically and historically, some cultures indeed were stronger than others for which they created such a big impact on the world. For example, Egypt and Rome. 

I have a suggestion that can catter both of these things with a single change into the game. 

You can make certain cultures compulsory for two consecutive eras rather than one. For these cultures there wouldn't be an option for changing culture in the second era, but only to upgrade it (and opening the next era's tech tree.) This way several cultures like Egypt and Rome can be made into big powerhouses for the era they are chosen in, but the need of them to be continued for two eras would balance them into the gameplay. You can discuss this idea with your team, and maybe you can refine this idea in a far better concept for the proper implementation into the game. Like you can make some cultures strong for the era they are chosen in, and some bigger powerhouses in the second of their era's too by providing them additional bonuses in the next era, second EB/EU's or additional bonuses to the existing EUs (even the ones already built.) I believe this concept can bring some positive changes into the game. Egypt can retain some of the nerfs it faced recently, and Rome can be given additional bonuses to make them seriously strong for their need of expansion. You can even make something like Rome to be a culture compulsory for 3 eras, but will provide 2 EBs and 2 EUs spread across the later era's tech tree. 

This change will slightly hurt your selling point of 'Million' types of civilizations. But honestly, that's only a selling point. Gamers don't feel that way. For them selection of different cultures is only for different bonuses they receive in-game. And honestly, no one will ever play this game even for a thousand ways, as some cultures will always have good affinity to be paired with some others and will always be played together. Moreover, the addition of so many new cultures have increased the quantum several times than a Million already. But if you want to keep the 'Million' tag, you can consider adding one more era into the game. Personally I think the game already has good enough eras.