Logo Platform
logo amplifiers simplified

A concern regarding cultural mix-matching

Copied to clipboard!
5 years ago
Sep 23, 2019, 2:21:00 AM

I don't know how you're doing eras, so maybe this has no consequence, but Ming wasn't really "Medieval" unless you consider the 1500s and 1600s the medieval era. Even then, there are much better "Medieval" Chinese dynasties like the Song or even Tang.

0Send private message
5 years ago
Sep 23, 2019, 8:59:08 AM
CK2Benchmarks wrote:

I don't know how you're doing eras, so maybe this has no consequence, but Ming wasn't really "Medieval" unless you consider the 1500s and 1600s the medieval era. Even then, there are much better "Medieval" Chinese dynasties like the Song or even Tang.

Thanks for the heads-up. In fact, that was an error on Meedoc's part--the Ming culture will appear after the Medieval era, just as they did in history. It can be tricky keeping track of all sixty cultures off the top of one's head!

0Send private message
?

Click here to login

Reply
Comment

Characters : 0
No results
0Send private message