What do you mean by :

Army on another civ territory: The civ will have to pay the penalty to the civ.

I expect this to be settled on basic diplmacy,like open borders or not?

Also I hope you can enact Embargo on basic diplomacy, while with this it would be International Embargo forcing people to issue embargo

Im not sure how you would handle elections, but i think each civ should get X number of vote at first;

Then you could buy extra vote with Influence

You could bribe vote from others civs with gold 

There could be more law related to who get votes, like :

Democratic relevance: you gain X votes for Y pop

Technocracy: can buy vote with science

Anti-cooruption law: disable bribing votes with golds ?

Bribing could just be a basic diplomatic action

Just some ideas but something along those lines maybe if it doesnt make some people too powerful

sure that looks like a fun idea :)

There was an older thread discussing this in detail here, although it seems to be missing for some reason.

Eulogos wrote:

There was an older thread discussing this in detail here, although it seems to be missing for some reason.

i removed it because i think that idea is not complete and civ centric.

werewolflord wrote:

What do you mean by :

Army on another civ territory: The civ will have to pay the penalty to the civ.

I expect this to be settled on basic diplmacy,like open borders or not?

Also I hope you can enact Embargo on basic diplomacy, while with this it would be International Embargo forcing people to issue embargo

Im not sure how you would handle elections, but i think each civ should get X number of vote at first;

Then you could buy extra vote with Influence

You could bribe vote from others civs with gold 

There could be more law related to who get votes, like :

Democratic relevance: you gain X votes for Y pop

Technocracy: can buy vote with science

Anti-cooruption law: disable bribing votes with golds ?

Bribing could just be a basic diplomatic action

Just some ideas but something along those lines maybe if it doesnt make some people too powerful

Army on othet civ mean intrusion of borders of other civ

Penalty can be like fall of trade , relationship,etc.

I want international embargo which is more impactful then self declared embargo.

Vote power can be gained by military size, trade,alliance,etc.

Abhi2410 wrote:

Eulogos wrote:

There was an older thread discussing this in detail here, although it seems to be missing for some reason.

i removed it because i think that idea is not complete and civ centric.

That's absurd. If the idea was incomplete then that means work on it more, not throw it all away and start over. And of course it's Civ centric - this game is a direct competitor to Civ. That's like saying a new car is bad because it has four wheels like other cars. Some people put a lot of effort into posts there and for you to throw it all away so that we can have an even more incomplete idea without other people's thoughts relating to the systems in Civ is rude.

Eulogos wrote:

Abhi2410 wrote:

Eulogos wrote:

There was an older thread discussing this in detail here, although it seems to be missing for some reason.

i removed it because i think that idea is not complete and civ centric.

That's absurd. If the idea was incomplete then that means work on it more, not throw it all away and start over. And of course it's Civ centric - this game is a direct competitor to Civ. That's like saying a new car is bad because it has four wheels like other cars. Some people put a lot of effort into posts there and for you to throw it all away so that we can have an even more incomplete idea without other people's thoughts relating to the systems in Civ is rude.

Complains of old idea by people are very similar to civ 6 and the ideas presented by humankind are new type so I think there should be difference than civ like.

I will allow that thread again.

Whilst I like the idea of the United Nations it shouldn't be mandatory to join it.

Joining the UN should give all member nations some sort of bonus, additional gold and science generated from all international trade routes for example.

Electing not to join the UN means you do not gain those benefits but also means you are not bound by any of the diplomatic resolutions passed by the UN.

PaladinKing wrote:

Whilst I like the idea of the United Nations it shouldn't be mandatory to join it.

Joining the UN should give all member nations some sort of bonus, additional gold and science generated from all international trade routes for example.

Electing not to join the UN means you do not gain those benefits but also means you are not bound by any of the diplomatic resolutions passed by the UN.

Not joining UN is like taking a disadvantage and cannot defend a resolution against us.

Abhi2410 wrote:

Voting Power in UN can be decided by giving donations to UN by player and other civs.

The voting power should either be equal for all (so that it become a catch-up mechanic) or it should be based on fame 

KurouRingo wrote:

Abhi2410 wrote:

Voting Power in UN can be decided by giving donations to UN by player and other civs.

The voting power should either be equal for all (so that it become a catch-up mechanic) or it should be based on fame 

If money will have role i think it is more effective, fame is good but little overpowering.