+1 from me!
IT IS a GOOD IDEA! and it should be considered by the creators,historically speaking, please note what big changes took place in the war when the army began to be transported by rail.
Bullet train started running in Japan and how USA changed when the two ends of the country were joined by railroads.
BUT I propose that bridges and tunnels should be built by the player. In fact, the construction of the tunnels does not take a week...
I would add a highway with small cars! also built by the player.

wiktator wrote:

+1 from me!
IT IS a GOOD IDEA! and it should be considered by the creators,historically speaking, please note what big changes took place in the war when the army began to be transported by rail.
Bullet train started running in Japan and how USA changed when the two ends of the country were joined by railroads.
BUT I propose that bridges and tunnels should be built by the player. In fact, the construction of the tunnels does not take a week...
I would add a highway with small cars! also built by the player.

Thankyou and i want that if i see a modern era with a modern infra not with small roads and thing only change is building.

well in other games of this type, I miss seeing that the country what i making has "living people" I'm not asking for single people, BUT crowds, moving vehicles and trains

Im quite sure roads will upgrade into rails (or like increase road effect, it would be weird if railroad are not represented), no idea if its automatic or not

Having to invest in it is nice, could work like infrastructrure to be built in the territorry

Ithink it should just help movement and trade routes though to keep it simple (could do everything you say if ther eis trade route, and that they can give other boost than just money depending of the quarters from origin city)

MasterPaw wrote:

Im quite sure roads will upgrade into rails (or like increase road effect, it would be weird if railroad are not represented), no idea if its automatic or not

Having to invest in it is nice, could work like infrastructrure to be built in the territorry

Ithink it should just help movement and trade routes though to keep it simple (could do everything you say if ther eis trade route, and that they can give other boost than just money depending of the quarters from origin city)

This i suggest to give a modern view and in modern view i refer to increase of population and demand. A bullock cart and dirt is insufficient for population and demand.

 In railway i am not refering to upgradation of road to rail pls read company thread, construction of infrastructure.

I have explained in it

MasterPaw wrote:

Im quite sure roads will upgrade into rails (or like increase road effect, it would be weird if railroad are not represented), no idea if its automatic or not

Having to invest in it is nice, could work like infrastructrure to be built in the territorry

Ithink it should just help movement and trade routes though to keep it simple (could do everything you say if ther eis trade route, and that they can give other boost than just money depending of the quarters from origin city)

PLEASE DONT!
it is very boring that all roads suddenly become railroads....
is in almost all CV games and its not represents reality... YES, in the game the reality he he he
but look you are NOT traveling to another city by train ONLY
the railroad should be separate from the roads and railroad expansion should go where the player wants...

Interesting, you are saying you want little "sims" to be moving about - this thread had me a little confused in the middle, 

I am confused about these roads and rails - this is why I can't play Civ 6 it's too complicated and makes no sense, I was hoping humankind to be more natural and realistic which it is, thank you

Do you build these roads like you would in simcity