Description: The first line of the tooltip was confusing/misleading when compared with the rest of the tooltip. And the way the tooltip describes stealth regeneration at the end was not accurate.
Instead of "When an army has at least one Unit with Stealth, it can be Concealed.", I think what it meant was "When an army consists only of Units with Stealth, it can be Concealed."
Also instead of "To regain Stealth, the Army must move to a friendly Territory.", According to the current stealth system it should be "To regain Stealth, the Army must move to a Territory that doesn't have Detection."
Romani0 wrote: "To regain Stealth, the Army must move to a Territory that doesn't have Detection."
I like it. Additionally, if the stealtharmy is in a friendly territory that has detection against it (from an enemy army), that stealth army can regain stealth by standing in a friendly Admin Centre/Plaza.
RedSirus wrote: if the stealtharmy is in a friendly territory that has detection against it (from an enemy army), that stealth army can regain stealth by standing in a friendly Admin Centre/Plaza.
Instead of "When an army has at least one Unit with Stealth, it can be Concealed.", I think what it meant was "When an army consists only of Units with Stealth, it can be Concealed."
it states later in the tooltip that having no-stealth unit in the army makes it unable to be concealed. Although I do wonder if the tooltip couldn't do just straight without that first sentence and start with 'The Stealth of the entire Army is displayed (...)'
Instead of "When an army has at least one Unit with Stealth, it can be Concealed.", I think what it meant was "When an army consists only of Units with Stealth, it can be Concealed."
it states later in the tooltip that having no-stealth unit in the army makes it unable to be concealed. Although I do wonder if the tooltip couldn't do just straight without that first sentence and start with 'The Stealth of the entire Army is displayed (...)'
Yeah, that is why the tooltip is confusing as the first sentence is wrong and contradicting with the rest. It confused me at least. We can remove the first sentence instead of changing it as it is common sense I guess.
Romani0
Newcomer
Romani0
Newcomer
6 400g2g ptsReport comment
Why do you report Romani0?
Are you sure you want to block Romani0 ?
BlockCancelAre you sure you want to unblock Romani0 ?
UnblockCancelVIPRedSirus
Kind Enthusiast
VIPRedSirus
Kind Enthusiast
32 200g2g ptsReport comment
Why do you report RedSirus?
Are you sure you want to block RedSirus ?
BlockCancelAre you sure you want to unblock RedSirus ?
UnblockCancelA1y0sh4
Pro Thinker
(A really nice and pleasing signature)
A1y0sh4
Pro Thinker
7 800g2g ptsReport comment
Why do you report A1y0sh4?
Are you sure you want to block A1y0sh4 ?
BlockCancelAre you sure you want to unblock A1y0sh4 ?
UnblockCancelVIPRedSirus
Kind Enthusiast
VIPRedSirus
Kind Enthusiast
32 200g2g ptsReport comment
Why do you report RedSirus?
Are you sure you want to block RedSirus ?
BlockCancelAre you sure you want to unblock RedSirus ?
UnblockCancelDNLH
Wannabe Amoeba
That would be cool, right?
DNLH
Wannabe Amoeba
32 400g2g ptsReport comment
Why do you report DNLH?
Are you sure you want to block DNLH ?
BlockCancelAre you sure you want to unblock DNLH ?
UnblockCancelRomani0
Newcomer
Romani0
Newcomer
6 400g2g ptsReport comment
Why do you report Romani0?
Are you sure you want to block Romani0 ?
BlockCancelAre you sure you want to unblock Romani0 ?
UnblockCancelRomani0
Newcomer
Romani0
Newcomer
6 400g2g ptsReport comment
Why do you report Romani0?
Are you sure you want to block Romani0 ?
BlockCancelAre you sure you want to unblock Romani0 ?
UnblockCancelDEVClankerBanker
Newcomer
DEVClankerBanker
Newcomer
2 700g2g ptsReport comment
Why do you report ClankerBanker?
Are you sure you want to block ClankerBanker ?
BlockCancelAre you sure you want to unblock ClankerBanker ?
UnblockCancel